Mayweather v. Pacquiao Piracy Leads to $30,000 Court Judgement

contributing to this site’s archived Camiseta Urawa Red Diamonds situation summaries of battle sports piracy judgements, reasons were released this week by the us district Court, M.D. Louisiana, ordering a accused to pay $30,000 for showing Mayweather v. Pacquiao without a licence.

In the recent situation (J&J sports Productions, Inc. v. cheers sports Bar as well as Grill, LLC) the accused displayed the boxing Pay Per view fight Camiseta AC Milan in their industrial establishment without paying the industrial sub licence charge enabling them to do so.  The charge would have been, at most, $3,000.  They were sued as well as in reaction took the ostrich method to litigation as well as failed to respond.  The Plaintiff effectively acquired default judgement in an amount 10x what the licence would have cost.  In discovering $6,000 in statutory damages as well as a even more $24,000 in improved damages were required district judge Brian A. Jackson offered the complying with reasons:

The Court discovers that statutory damages in an amount twice what the sublicensing charge for lawful broadcast would have been is “just” under the situations in this case. See id. Here, Plaintiff has recognized that Defendant’s sublicensing charge would have been, at most, $3,000. The Program’s sub-license rate for an establishment with a capability of sixty to one-hundred people was $3,000; cheers might hold roughly seventy-five people. (Doc. 10-10 at p. 2, 6; Doc. 16-9 at p. 3; Doc. 16-1 at p. 3). Therefore, the Court awards Plaintiff statutory damages in the amount of $6,000….

Nonetheless, there is a adequate showing that accused made considerable unlawful monetary gains by Camiseta Atletico Madrid serving alcoholic beverages as well as food during the broadcast since the broadcast many likely led to an enhanced number of patrons, as well as therefore to an boost in revenues from food as well as beverages. (Docs. 16-7, 16-8). In addition, Plaintiffs detective noted that after she went into Cheers, an worker was “at the door accepting money to get in the venue” (Doc. 16-8 at p. 1), as well as one more detective noted that she observed five televisions each as well as counted roughly seventy-five patrons. (Doc. 16-7 at p. 1). Plaintiff attests to investing significant resources to combating piracy, however assigns a value only to the maximum $3,000 sublicensing charge it was rejected because of Defendant’s unlawful habits in actual damages. (Doc. 16-9 at p. 2-3).

Here, because of Defendant’s industrial advantage, the Court awards extra damages of $24,000, which shows an award equal to four times the amount of the statutory damages awarded.

Advertisement

Share this:
Twitter
Facebook

Like this:
Like Loading…

Related

$30,000 damage evaluation for Piracy of Mayweather Jr. vs PacquiaoSeptember 10, 2018In “piracy”
$9,350 in damages purchased for Mayweather v. Pacquiao industrial PiracyJune 19, 2018In “piracy”
$8,000 damage evaluation for Piracy of Mayweather vs PacquiaoAugust 9, 2018In “piracy”